|
|
Pages: [1] 
|
 |
|
 Author
|
Topic: Branching out (Read 1323 times)
|
|
Aragon Speed
|
Have you guys ever thought of branching out and optimising other boinc projects?
I was thinking that some of the other main projects would benefit from your expertise. (Rosetta springs to mind.)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Josef W. Segur
|
No other project is open source, and IMO no other project is nearly as worthy.
Joe
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Aragon Speed
|
No other project is open source My bad.  I assumed that all bionic projects were open source by definition. Ah well. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Crunch3r
Porting Team
Knight Templar
 Offline
Posts: 368
|
No other project is open source, and IMO no other project is nearly as worthy.
Joe
That's not quite true. Nanohive@home is open source and Leiden Classical offers source too. Also there is Roseta@home, you have to ask the rosetta administration to get the source. Of course there's still the question of what is to be considered worthy... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I want to share something with you: The three little sentences that will get you through life. Number 1: Cover for me. Number 2: Oh, good idea, Boss! Number 3: It was like that when I got here.
Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
Aragon Speed
|
Well as Rosetta is trying to find cures for cancer, HIV and others, I think that might rank fairly high on the worthiness scale  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Crunch3r
Porting Team
Knight Templar
Offline
Posts: 368
|
Well as Rosetta is trying to find cures for cancer, HIV and others, I think that might rank fairly high on the worthiness scale Same as Simap, WCG proteins@home, predictor@home Folding@home etc... (and hundreds of the same kind before) As to now nothing usefull found at all. IMO i really don't need the hassle with rosetta@home at all, some other guys allready got the source (i think "who?" and someone from AMD). So let them figure out how to optimize it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I want to share something with you: The three little sentences that will get you through life. Number 1: Cover for me. Number 2: Oh, good idea, Boss! Number 3: It was like that when I got here.
Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
Aragon Speed
|
Well as Rosetta is trying to find cures for cancer, HIV and others, I think that might rank fairly high on the worthiness scale Same as Simap, WCG proteins@home, predictor@home Folding@home etc... (and hundreds of the same kind before) As to now nothing usefull found at all. IMO i really don't need the hassle with rosetta@home at all, some other guys allready got the source (i think "who?" and someone from AMD). So let them figure out how to optimize it. Sounds like a plan to me  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 
|
|
|
|
Quote!
It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.- Murphy's Law
|
 |  |  |
| |
| Site Statistics |
| Total Members: | 712 |
| Total Posts: | 5,149 |
| Total Topics: | 344 | | Downloads |
| Apps |
| Windows R-1.x | 24,298 |
| Windows R-2.0 | 19,537 |
| Windows R-2.2 | 34,486 |
| Linux 32bit 1.x | 6,320 |
| Linux 32bit 2.2 | 3,874 |
| Linux 64bit 2.2 | 1,345 |
| Alpha/IA64 | 106 |
| FreeBSD | 295 |
| HPUX | 202 |
| Subtotal: | 89,860 |
| Source packs: | 3,488 |
| Tool/WU packs: | 5,828 |
| Total: | 118,921 | | GBs dl'd: | 178.12 | | Pages served |
| Today: | 297 |
| Total: | 2,230,632 |
| (since 6/26/2006) |
| 172 Donations to S@H |
| U.S. Dollars: | 3,196.59 |
| Euros: | 830.90 |
| Last 24h: | $ 0.00 |
| Avg./24h: | $ 14.07 |
| Estim. total: | $ 4,276.76 |
Latest Member:
tharn |
| |
 | |  |
| | |
| |
Online users/last 15m
13 Guests, 0 Users
26 Members/last 24hGecko_R7, Alex Kan, Geek@Play, Devaster, WHRoeder, firefox, popandbob, seti_britta, Josef W. Segur, nikolaevaleksei, ajs, tharn, Radiohead, Yurik, DerToT, Marker, j_groothu, korpela, clk, Haselgrove, Stefan Ledwina, wes_shaw, The Rabbit, kvic, Vid Vidmar, yriErektile Dysfunktion,
| |
| | |
|
